Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Advances in Deep Learning Techniques
Articles

Quantum-Inspired Optimization Techniques for IoT Networks: Focusing on Resource Allocation and Network Efficiency Enhancement for Improved IoT Functionality

PDF
  • Mohan Raparthi
Mohan Raparthi
Software Engineer, Google Alphabet (Verily Life Science), Dallas, Texas, USA
Cover

Published 07-07-2022

Keywords

  • Quantum-Inspired Optimization,
  • IoT Networks,
  • Resource Allocation,
  • Network Efficiency,
  • Quantum Annealing,
  • Genetic Algorithms,
  • Particle Swarm Optimization,
  • Scalability,
  • Security,
  • Implementation
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
M. Raparthi, “Quantum-Inspired Optimization Techniques for IoT Networks: Focusing on Resource Allocation and Network Efficiency Enhancement for Improved IoT Functionality”, Adv. in Deep Learning Techniques, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Jul. 2022.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) networks are characterized by a vast number of interconnected devices that require efficient resource allocation and network management. Traditional optimization techniques may not fully address the complex nature of IoT networks. This paper presents a comprehensive review of quantum-inspired optimization techniques for enhancing resource allocation and network efficiency in IoT environments. We examine how quantum-inspired algorithms such as Quantum Annealing, Quantum Genetic Algorithms, and Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization can be applied to address challenges in resource allocation, network routing, and energy efficiency. By leveraging principles from quantum computing, these techniques offer novel approaches to solving optimization problems in IoT networks. We also discuss the potential benefits and challenges of integrating quantum-inspired optimization techniques into IoT systems, including considerations for scalability, security, and implementation complexity. Overall, this paper provides insights into the promising future of quantum-inspired optimization for enhancing IoT network performance and efficiency.

PDF

References

  1. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "A Review of Software Quality Models: A Comprehensive Analysis." Journal of Science & Technology 1.1 (2020): 40-53.
  2. Bennink RS, Bentley SJ, Boyd RW. "Two-Photon" Coincidence Imaging with a Classical Source. Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Jul 1;89(1):1-4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.113601.
  3. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "Bridging the Gap: Methodological Insights from Cognitive Science for Enhanced Requirement Gathering." Journal of Science & Technology 1.1 (2020): 61-66.
  4. Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H. Quantum Cryptography. Rev Mod Phys. 2002 Jan 1;74(1):145-195. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145.
  5. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "Future Directions and Concluding Remarks Navigating the Horizon of Software Quality Engineering." Journal of Science & Technology 1.1 (2020): 67-81.
  6. Lo H, Chau H. Is quantum bit commitment really possible? Phys Rev Lett. 1997 Aug 18;78(17):3410-3413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3410.
  7. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "Quality and Metrics in Software Quality Engineering." Journal of Science & Technology 2.1 (2021): 62-69.
  8. Lütkenhaus N. Security against individual attacks for realistic quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A. 2000 Oct;61(5):1-6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052304.
  9. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "The Crucial Role of Inspection in Software Quality Assurance." Journal of Science & Technology 2.1 (2021): 70-77.
  10. Peev M, Pacher C, Alléaume R, Barreiro C, Bouda J, Boxleitner W, Debuisschert T, Diamanti E, Dianati M, Dynes J, Fasel S. The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna. New J Phys. 2009 Jan 15;11(7):075001. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001.
  11. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "Unveiling the Future: Cybernetic Dynamics in Quality Assurance and Testing for Software Development." Journal of Science & Technology 2.1 (2021): 78-84.
  12. Stucki D, Gisin N, Guinnard O, Ribordy G, Zbinden H. Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system. New J Phys. 2002 Jan 21;4(1):41. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341.
  13. Pargaonkar, Shravan. "Unveiling the Challenges, A Comprehensive Review of Common Hurdles in Maintaining Software Quality." Journal of Science & Technology 2.1 (2021): 85-94.
  14. Tapster P. Quantum Cryptography – A Practical Approach. In: Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics. Springer. 2014 Nov 7 (pp. 359-385).
  15. Pargaonkar, S. (2020). A Review of Software Quality Models: A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Science & Technology, 1(1), 40-53.
  16. Thearle-Adams T. Quantum Cryptography: Secure Communications in the Information Age. Springer. 2006 Jan 1.
  17. Pargaonkar, S. (2020). Bridging the Gap: Methodological Insights from Cognitive Science for Enhanced Requirement Gathering. Journal of Science & Technology, 1(1), 61-66.
  18. Townsend PD, Rarity JG, Tapster PR. Single-photon interference in 10 km long optical fibre interferometer. Electron Lett. 1994 Jan 6;30(2):187-188. doi: 10.1049/el:19940125.
  19. Pargaonkar, S. (2020). Future Directions and Concluding Remarks Navigating the Horizon of Software Quality Engineering. Journal of Science & Technology, 1(1), 67-81.
  20. Wang X, Zhang X, Lu J, Fang H, Chen D. Quantum cryptography with multi-entangled photons. Opt Lett. 2021 Feb 1;46(3):424-427. doi: 10.1364/OL.411696.
  21. Pargaonkar, S. (2021). Quality and Metrics in Software Quality Engineering. Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1), 62-69.
  22. Pargaonkar, S. (2021). The Crucial Role of Inspection in Software Quality Assurance. Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1), 70-77.
  23. Pargaonkar, S. (2021). Unveiling the Future: Cybernetic Dynamics in Quality Assurance and Testing for Software Development. Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1), 78-84.
  24. Pargaonkar, S. (2021). Unveiling the Challenges, A Comprehensive Review of Common Hurdles in Maintaining Software Quality. Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1), 85-94.