Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Advances in Deep Learning Techniques
Articles

AI-Powered Automation in DevOps for Intelligent Release Management: Techniques for Reducing Deployment Failures and Improving Software Quality

PDF
  • Sumanth Tatineni,
  • Anirudh Mustyala
Sumanth Tatineni
Devops Engineer, Idexcel Inc, USA
Anirudh Mustyala
Sr Associate Software Engineer, JP Morgan Chase, USA
Cover

Published 21-02-2021

Keywords

  • AI-powered DevOps,
  • Intelligent Release Management,
  • Deployment Failure Reduction,
  • Software Quality Improvement,
  • Continuous Monitoring,
  • Machine Learning,
  • Anomaly Detection,
  • Predictive Modeling,
  • Root Cause Analysis,
  • DevOps Pipeline Optimization
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
S. Tatineni and A. Mustyala, “AI-Powered Automation in DevOps for Intelligent Release Management: Techniques for Reducing Deployment Failures and Improving Software Quality”, Adv. in Deep Learning Techniques, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74–110, Feb. 2021.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The relentless pursuit of faster software delivery cycles necessitates a paradigm shift in DevOps practices. Traditional, manual release management processes struggle to keep pace with the ever-increasing complexity and velocity of modern software development. This research delves into the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) within DevOps, specifically its application in intelligent release management. By leveraging AI-powered automation techniques, organizations can significantly reduce deployment failures and elevate software quality through continuous monitoring and analysis.

The paper commences by establishing the context of the evolving DevOps landscape. The limitations of manual release management methods are highlighted, particularly their susceptibility to human error and inability to scale effectively in dynamic environments. Subsequently, the paper explores the fundamental concepts of AI, emphasizing its potential to revolutionize software delivery pipelines. Machine learning (ML) algorithms, a core tenet of AI, are introduced as the driving force behind intelligent automation. Their ability to learn from vast datasets and identify patterns paves the way for proactive release management strategies.

The crux of the paper revolves around the specific AI-powered techniques that contribute to intelligent release management. A prominent technique is continuous monitoring. By deploying AI-powered monitoring tools, DevOps teams gain real-time insights into system behavior. These tools can ingest data from various sources, including infrastructure logs, application performance metrics, and user experience data. AI algorithms then analyze this data stream to detect anomalies and identify potential issues that could lead to deployment failures. Early detection of anomalies empowers proactive intervention, allowing teams to address concerns before they escalate into critical production disruptions.

Another significant technique is anomaly detection. Anomaly detection algorithms leverage historical data to establish baseline system behavior. Deviations from this baseline are flagged as potential anomalies, prompting further investigation. AI's ability to identify subtle yet critical deviations enables teams to prevent failures that might otherwise escape human scrutiny. Techniques like statistical anomaly detection, clustering algorithms, and unsupervised learning models can be effectively employed for this purpose.

Furthermore, the paper examines the role of predictive modeling in intelligent release management. By analyzing historical deployment data and incorporating real-time monitoring information, AI models can predict the likelihood of deployment failures. This predictive capability equips teams to prioritize deployments based on risk and implement targeted interventions to mitigate potential issues. Machine learning algorithms like logistic regression, random forests, and gradient boosting can be utilized to develop robust predictive models.

The paper also explores the significance of root cause analysis in enhancing release management practices. When deployments fail, pinpointing the root cause becomes crucial for preventing future occurrences. AI-powered tools can analyze system logs, application traces, and infrastructure data to identify the root cause of failures with increased accuracy and efficiency. This not only expedites troubleshooting but also empowers teams to address the underlying issues and prevent similar failures in subsequent deployments. Techniques like natural language processing (NLP) and causal inference algorithms can bolster root cause analysis capabilities.

Finally, the paper discusses the role of AI in DevOps pipeline optimization. By analyzing deployment pipelines and identifying bottlenecks or inefficiencies, AI can suggest optimizations. This can involve streamlining testing processes, automating configuration management tasks, or dynamically allocating resources. Optimizing pipelines through AI leads to faster deployments, reduced costs, and improved overall release management efficiency.

The paper concludes by emphasizing the substantial benefits of AI-powered automation in intelligent release management. By employing the aforementioned techniques, DevOps teams can achieve significant reductions in deployment failures, leading to increased software quality and improved user experience. Additionally, the research highlights the need for further exploration in areas like interpretability of AI models and the integration of AI with existing DevOps toolchains. Overall, this research offers a comprehensive overview of AI's transformative potential in shaping the future of intelligent release management within the DevOps domain.

PDF

References

  1. Aho, D., Sethi, R., & Ullman, J. D. (2007). Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
  2. Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2012). Software Architecture in Practice (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
  3. Tatineni, Sumanth. "Applying DevOps Practices for Quality and Reliability Improvement in Cloud-Based Systems." Technix international journal for engineering research (TIJER)10.11 (2023): 374-380.
  4. Chen, T., Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2018, April). Machine learning for software release engineering: A survey. In 2018 IEEE 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) (pp. 179-190). IEEE.
  5. Chick, T., & Engels, G. (2008). Service-Oriented Computing. Bentham Science Publishers.
  6. Chollak, D., Forrest, C., Iyer, C., Oliner, A., Poore, J., Sankar, Z., & Sinha, K. (2009). Anomaly detection for graph-based representations of software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35(3), 380-401.
  7. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018, June). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (pp. 4171-4186). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Felten, E. W., & Klein, D. (2010). Security as a Service: Moving Security to the Cloud (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  9. Fenton, N. E., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2008). Software Metrics: A Practical Guide for Developers and Testers (3rd ed.). International Thomson Publishing.
  10. Gasser, L. (2011). Building Reliable Applications with Node.js (1st ed.). O'Reilly Media.
  11. Gérald, M. (2017). Model Based Testing: A Practical Approach (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  12. Guo, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Xiao, S., Li, Y., & Sun, Y. (2016, May). Towards deep learning based software reliability prediction. In 2016 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE) (pp. 120-130). IEEE.
  13. Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (3rd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  14. Jiang, Z., Zhang, S., Leung, V. C. M., & Xu, B. (2013). Automated root cause analysis for software failures using weakest preconditions. In 2013 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE) (pp. 147-156). IEEE.
  15. Jin, W., Xu, W., Zhou, Y., Xu, B., & Sun, Y. (2017). Mining bug fixes for fault localization. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 449-460). IEEE.
  16. Kaggle (2023). Machine Learning Competitions & Datasets | Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/
  17. Kampmann, P., & Alonso, G. (2015). Database Systems with Python Usage (1st ed.). Apress.
  18. Kim, S., Pande, S., & Khurshid, S. (2006). Automatic abstraction for fault localization. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering (pp. 321-330). ACM.
  19. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Lami, N., Boukhetala, H., & Ould-Khelifa, M. (2018). A survey of machine learning techniques for software release prediction. Journal of Systems and Software, 142, 130-151.