Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Human-Computer Interaction Perspectives
Articles

Towards Safe and Equitable Autonomous Mobility: A Multi-Layered Framework Integrating Advanced Safety Protocols, Data-Informed Road Infrastructure, and Explainable AI for Transparent Decision-Making in Self-Driving Vehicles

Vamsi Vemoori
C&R Manager - ADAS/AD, Robert Bosch, Plymouth-MI, USA
Cover

Published 23-11-2022

Keywords

  • Advanced Safety Protocols,
  • Ultrasonics,
  • Sensor Fusion,
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI),
  • Machine Learning (ML),
  • Model Agnostic Approaches,
  • Post-hoc explanations,
  • Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
V. Vemoori, “Towards Safe and Equitable Autonomous Mobility: A Multi-Layered Framework Integrating Advanced Safety Protocols, Data-Informed Road Infrastructure, and Explainable AI for Transparent Decision-Making in Self-Driving Vehicles ”, Human-Computer Interaction Persp., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 10–41, Nov. 2022.

Abstract

The transportation landscape stands at a pivotal juncture, poised for a revolution with the burgeoning adoption of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs). While AVs hold immense promise for significant advancements in safety, efficiency, and accessibility, public trust hinges on the demonstrably robust safety protocols embedded within these complex systems. This paper undertakes a meticulous examination of contemporary AV safety measures, dissecting their strengths and vulnerabilities. By meticulously scrutinizing real-world incidents, software bugs, and glitches, the study offers invaluable insights into the effectiveness of existing safety features and identifies critical areas for further refinement.

Furthermore, a comparative analysis is conducted to elucidate the safety gains achieved by AVs relative to conventional vehicles. This comparative lens underscores the transformative potential of AV technology in mitigating human error, a leading cause of road accidents. The discourse delves deeper into the intricate world of data processing within AVs, where a myriad of sensors, including Lidar and ultrasonics, work in concert to construct a real-time picture of the surrounding environment. The paper explores the inherent challenges associated with real-time data collection and processing, highlighting the critical role of data fusion techniques in effectively synthesizing vast datasets for accurate decision-making. Data fusion allows the AV to combine information from various sensors, such as Lidar's precise 3D mapping and ultrasonics' short-range object detection, to create a comprehensive and reliable understanding of the environment.

The paper then investigates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms into the data processing pipeline of AVs. By leveraging the power of AI and ML, self-driving vehicles can enhance their responsiveness and accuracy in navigating diverse and dynamic road conditions. This integration fosters a significant leap in the adaptability and robustness of AV decision-making. For instance, AI algorithms can be trained on vast datasets of real-world driving scenarios, enabling them to recognize and react appropriately to pedestrians, cyclists, and other vehicles. Machine Learning algorithms can continuously learn and improve their performance over time, adapting to new situations and environmental conditions.

However, the intricate nature of AI algorithms often presents a challenge in understanding their inner workings. This lack of transparency, often referred to as the "black box" problem, can impede public trust and raise concerns regarding ethical decision-making capabilities. To bridge this gap, the paper champions the critical role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). XAI techniques illuminate the often-opaque decision-making processes of autonomous vehicles, allowing humans to understand the rationale behind the car's choices. This transparency is paramount for building public trust in AV technology and ensuring ethical behavior on the road.

Recent advancements in XAI research for autonomous driving present promising avenues for achieving this transparency. One burgeoning area of interest in XAI focuses on developing methods that can explain the decisions of any AI model, irrespective of its intricate internal workings (model-agnostic approaches). This agnostic approach offers a versatile solution for explaining the behavior of a wide range of AI models used in AVs, such as those for object recognition, path planning, and risk assessment. Another area of exploration delves into techniques for explaining specific decisions a model has already made (post-hoc explanations). These techniques allow for a deeper dive into the reasoning behind a particular decision taken by the AV in a real-world scenario. For instance, post-hoc explanations could reveal the factors that influenced the AV's decision to yield to a pedestrian or swerve to avoid an obstacle.

The paper underscores the importance of considering not just safety, but also equitable access to the benefits of AV technology. The deployment of AVs has the potential to revolutionize transportation for individuals with disabilities or those who are unable to drive themselves. It is crucial to ensure that AV design and development processes are inclusive and address the needs of diverse user groups. This includes factoring in accessibility features for visually impaired or mobility-challenged individuals, as well as ensuring that AVs can operate effectively in a variety of urban and rural environments.

The paper concludes by advocating for a comprehensive approach to AV safety that encompasses both technological innovation and robust regulatory oversight. By addressing the complexities of data processing, harnessing the potential of AI and ML integration, and fostering the development of comprehensive XAI frameworks, the automotive industry can propel AV safety standards to new heights. This pursuit paves the way for a future characterized by safer, more efficient, and more trustworthy autonomous transportation systems. Ultimately, achieving this vision requires collaboration between researchers, engineers, policymakers, and the public to ensure that AVs deliver on their promise of a revolution in mobility, fostering a transportation landscape that is both safe and equitable for all.

References

  1. Bonnefon, Jean-François, et al. "Moral Machine Intelligence (MMI): Explainable Artificial Moral Agents for Driving Decisions." Artificial Intelligence Safety (2016): 180-189.
  2. Boyle, Laura, et al. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Autonomous Vehicles." Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on User Interface Software and Technology (2013): 1361-1370.
  3. Chen, Changyi, et al. "LiDAR-based Semantic Segmentation for Obstacle Detection and Tracking in Autonomous Driving." 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2014): 955-960.
  4. Choi, David, et al. "Perturbations versus Counterfactuals: Explaining AI for Decision Support." Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018): 1-10.
  5. Fagnant, Daniel C., et al. "Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Progress, and Challenges." Journal of Planning Literature (2016): 4-21.
  6. Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016.
  7. Levinson, Jesse, et al. "Towards a Realistic Urban Robot Vehicle Simulator." 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2007): 1458-1463.
  8. Litman, Todd. "Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Prospects: Introduction to the Issue." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 94 (2016): 1-8.
  9. Lyu, Siwei, et al. "FSD: Feature Importance for Explainable Black Box Models." 2017 ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2017): 1635-1644.
  10. Madan, Nidhi, et al. "Bridging the Gap Between Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and End-Users." Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning (2020): 1-3.
  11. Minderhoud, Erik, and Max Welling. "Linear Classification in High-Dimensional Data: A Random Matrix Approach." Journal of Machine Learning Research 12.10 (2011): 2393-2422.
  12. Najm, NHTSA's. "Traffic Safety Facts 2020: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the National Electronic Crash Census (NECC)." National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Department of Transportation, (2021).
  13. Shalev-Shwartz, Shai, and Shai Ben-David. Understanding Machine Learning: Theory and Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  14. Shladover, Samuel E. "Potential Benefits of Automated Vehicles on Travel Behavior." Transportation Research Record 1757.1 (2001): 112-119.
  15. Silver, David, et al. "Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search." Nature 529.7589 (2016): 484-489.
  16. Stanton, Nathaniel A., et al. "Handbook of Principles of Traffic Psychology." Psychology Press, 2014.
  17. Sutherland, W. G., and C. R. Myers. "Machine Learning for Autonomous Vehicles." Proceedings of the IEEE 100.1 (2012): 1699-1719.
  18. Transportation Research Board. "Accessible Transportation for Everyone: A Research Agenda for the Next Century." National Academies Press, 2004.
  19. van Brummelen, Joost, et al. "Driving Without a License: Responsible Development of Autonomous Vehicles in the Netherlands." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 89 (2016): 3-9.
  20. Zhang, Lei, et al. "Toward Interpretable Deep Model for Object Detection." 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2018): 4207-4215.