Psychosocial Approach to the Effect of Stress on Performance in the Workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/JST.2023.4503Keywords:
Transactional model, optimal functioning zone, stress, appraisal, PerformanceAbstract
Our study aimed to investigate the effect of the interaction between stress perception and its intensity on performance in a professional context. We conducted a series of analyses to determine whether the way individuals perceive stress or the level of stress intensity plays a predominant role in determining workplace performance. Following the study results, we did not observe an interaction between stress perception and its intensity. However, participants who perceived stress as a challenge to overcome displayed higher levels of performance, while those who viewed stress as a threat to avoid had significantly lower performance levels, regardless of the perceived stress intensity. This observation underscores the significance of how individuals interpret stressful situations in the workplace. These findings have significant implications for managers, employees, and human resources professionals. They suggest that stress management in the workplace should focus on promoting a positive perception of stress as a challenge, which could enhance optimal performance. Ultimately, our study contributes to shedding light on the intricate relationship between stress perception, its intensity, and workplace performance, highlighting the potential of a positive stress perception to improve professional outcomes.
Readership Data
Refreshing Cached Analytics Data
The cached analytics data has become stale and thesciencebrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.
Downloads
References
i. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social" facilitation" as challenge and threat. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.68
ii. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4), 839. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839
iii. Gaudreau, P., & Blondin, J-P. (2002). Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of coping strategies employed by athletes in competitive sport settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00017-6
iv. Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology: A journal of human behavior.
v. Hanin, Y. L. (2000). Individual Zones of Optimal Functioning (IZOF) Model: Emotion-performance relationship in sport. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492596233.ch-003
vi. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
vii. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual review of psychology, 44(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245
viii. Monroe, S. M., & Kelley, J. M. (1995). Measurement of stress appraisal. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists, 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195086416.003.0006
Citation Metrics
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Safa Bennamate, Ahmed El Bouazzaoui (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of this research paper submitted to the journal owned and operated by The Science Brigade Group retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this Journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
How to Cite
