Machine Learning Applications in Actuarial Product Development: Enhancing Pricing and Risk Assessment

Machine Learning Applications in Actuarial Product Development: Enhancing Pricing and Risk Assessment

Authors

  • Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy Athene Annuity and Life company
  • Muthukrishnan Muthusubramanian Discover Financial Services, USA
  • Lavanya Shanmugam Tata Consultancy Services, USA

Downloads

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Actuarial Science

Abstract

The insurance industry thrives on the ability to accurately assess risk and translate that assessment into fair and competitive pricing for its products. Traditionally, actuaries have relied on statistical modeling techniques and historical data to achieve these goals. However, the ever-increasing volume and complexity of data available in the digital age present both challenges and opportunities for actuarial science. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for leveraging this data deluge, offering the potential to significantly enhance pricing accuracy and risk assessment in the context of actuarial product development.

This paper delves into the applications of ML in actuarial science, with a specific focus on its impact on pricing and risk assessment. We begin by outlining the fundamental principles of actuarial pricing and risk assessment, highlighting the limitations of traditional methods in a rapidly evolving risk landscape. Subsequently, we introduce the concept of machine learning, explaining its key algorithms and techniques relevant to the actuarial domain.

The core of the paper explores how ML techniques can be harnessed to improve pricing accuracy. We discuss the application of classification algorithms, such as logistic regression, random forests, and support vector machines, in identifying distinct risk profiles within a customer base. These algorithms can analyze a vast array of data points beyond traditional factors like age and location, including credit scores, driving behavior patterns (telematics data), and health information (wearable device data) – subject to regulatory approval and data privacy considerations. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of individual risk, enabling actuaries to develop more granular pricing structures that reflect the specific risk profile of each policyholder.

Furthermore, regression techniques such as linear regression, gradient boosting, and neural networks can be employed to predict future loss ratios with greater precision. By analyzing historical claims data alongside the aforementioned data points, these techniques can identify complex relationships between variables that might be missed by traditional actuarial models. This improved loss ratio prediction capability empowers actuaries to set pricing that accurately reflects the expected cost of claims for different customer segments.

The paper then explores the transformative impact of ML on risk assessment, a crucial step in the underwriting process. We discuss how ML algorithms can be utilized to automate risk scoring, streamlining the underwriting process and improving efficiency. By analyzing applicant data through classification algorithms, these models can assign risk scores that indicate the likelihood of an individual filing a claim. This allows underwriters to focus their efforts on high-risk cases, while streamlining approvals for low-risk applicants.

Moreover, unsupervised learning techniques like clustering can be employed to identify hidden patterns in customer data, potentially uncovering new risk factors or fraudulent activity. Clustering algorithms can group policyholders with similar characteristics, allowing actuaries to tailor product offerings and risk mitigation strategies to specific customer segments.

However, the integration of ML into actuarial science is not without its challenges. The paper addresses these challenges head-on, discussing issues such as data quality and bias, model interpretability, and regulatory considerations. The importance of ensuring data quality and addressing potential biases within the data used to train ML models is paramount. Techniques for data cleaning, bias mitigation algorithms, and human oversight are crucial for building robust and reliable models.

Furthermore, the "black box" nature of some ML algorithms can pose challenges in understanding how they arrive at their predictions. Techniques for model interpretability, such as feature importance analysis and decision trees, can shed light on the factors influencing model outputs and ensure transparency in the decision-making process.

Regulatory considerations also play a critical role in the adoption of ML in insurance. Regulatory bodies are constantly evolving their frameworks to address potential issues around fairness, transparency, and consumer protection in the context of AI-driven insurance practices. The paper briefly explores the current regulatory landscape and emphasizes the need for collaboration between insurers, actuaries, and regulatory bodies to ensure responsible and ethical implementation of ML in the actuarial domain.

This paper underscores the transformative potential of machine learning for actuarial product development. By leveraging ML techniques, actuaries can achieve greater accuracy in pricing and risk assessment, leading to the development of more competitive and customer-centric insurance products. However, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the challenges associated with ML adoption, ensuring data quality, model interpretability, and regulatory compliance. As the field of actuarial science continues to embrace machine learning, a new era of data-driven product development promises to reshape the insurance landscape, offering greater value to both insurers and policyholders.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Actuarial Standards Board (ASB). (2014). Using actuarial modeling techniques in non-life ratemaking. Casualty Actuarial Society.

Baesens, B., Freitas, A. A., Giannotti, F., & Viappiani, M. (2014). Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery (Vol. 14). Springer.

Bhardwaj, N., Gao, P., & Provost, P. (2018). Explainable AI for risk assessment in insurance. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 2217-2226).

Cherkasky, V., & Smola, A. J. (2004). Machine learning for risk assessment. In Financial engineering (pp. 1123-1136). Springer.

Christopoulos, A., Vrontakis, I., & Politis, G. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence for actuarial modeling: A review. Risks, 8(2), 13.

Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the age of big data. Science, 346(6210), 1243089.

Feldman, S., & Huttenlocher, A. (2004). Geometric harmonics for shape based object recognition. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (Vol. 2, pp. 361-370). IEEE.

Frees, E. W. (2010). Prediction uncertainty for actuarial models. North American Actuarial Journal, 14(1), 1-23.

Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 29(1), 1189-1232.

Goldstein, M., & Kaplan, W. (2014). Users' guide to statistical reasoning (Vol. 9). Cengage Learning.

Gorunescu, F. (2016). Data mining and machine learning in cybersecurity. John Wiley & Sons.

Green, T., & James, G. (2018. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R package version 0.6-0.

Guo, X., Zhang, L., You, Y., & Luo, Y. (2019). On explainable artificial intelligence for decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 118, 35-41.

Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural computation, 18(7), 1527-1554.

Hooker, G., & McClure, D. (2014). How big data is different. Peeling Back the Layers of Big Data (pp. 17-28).

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R (Vol. 112). Springer.

Jiao, P., Lv, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). A survey on explainable artificial intelligence for insurance risk assessment. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(1), 303-331.

Johnson, F. C., & Gupta, M. R. (2018). Fair machine learning for actuarial modeling. Risks, 6(2), 24.

Jordan, M. I. (2011). Derivative check computation of hessian. arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.4815.

Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Li, L. (2014). Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1771-1778).

Downloads

Published

24-08-2023

How to Cite

Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy, Muthukrishnan Muthusubramanian, and Lavanya Shanmugam. “Machine Learning Applications in Actuarial Product Development: Enhancing Pricing and Risk Assessment”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, Aug. 2023, pp. 34-65, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/265.
PlumX Metrics

Plaudit

License Terms

Ownership and Licensing:

Authors of this research paper submitted to the Journal of Science & Technology retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.

License Permissions:

Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal of Science & Technology. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.

Additional Distribution Arrangements:

Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in the Journal of Science & Technology.

Online Posting:

Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal of Science & Technology. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.

Responsibility and Liability:

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Journal of Science & Technology and The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.

Loading...