AI-Driven Methodologies for Mitigating Technical Debt in Legacy Systems
Keywords:
technical debt, legacy systemsAbstract
Technical debt, a pervasive challenge in software engineering, significantly hampers the maintainability, scalability, and performance of legacy systems, making them susceptible to inefficiencies and high maintenance costs. As software systems age, the accumulation of ad hoc solutions, outdated dependencies, and unoptimized code creates obstacles to innovation and system resilience. This paper investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methodologies to systematically mitigate technical debt in legacy systems. By leveraging AI techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and graph-based algorithms, the study delineates an array of approaches for automating code refactoring, dependency management, and system optimization. The proposed methodologies focus on analyzing and restructuring legacy codebases while preserving functional integrity, thus addressing key aspects of technical debt including code smells, architectural degradation, and redundant dependencies.
A key contribution of this research is the exploration of machine learning models tailored for identifying and prioritizing code smells and other technical debt indicators based on historical data and system-specific heuristics. These models can autonomously suggest refactoring actions that optimize code readability, modularity, and maintainability. Additionally, the integration of NLP techniques enables the analysis of unstructured documentation and comments within codebases, extracting actionable insights to align refactoring initiatives with domain-specific requirements. Dependency management is enhanced through graph-based algorithms that analyze module interconnections, identifying circular dependencies, redundant linkages, and bottlenecks. The paper also examines system optimization through AI techniques that detect performance anomalies and propose efficient solutions to optimize computational resources and reduce latency.
Practical applications of AI methodologies in mitigating technical debt are presented through case studies and experimental evaluations. These examples highlight the transformative potential of AI in improving the resilience and longevity of legacy systems. One case study demonstrates the application of reinforcement learning to evolve system architecture iteratively, reducing architectural debt and improving scalability. Another example explores automated refactoring tools augmented with AI algorithms that achieve significant reductions in code complexity and maintenance efforts. The evaluation framework considers metrics such as cyclomatic complexity, cohesion, coupling, and fault proneness to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of these methodologies.
The challenges of implementing AI-driven solutions are thoroughly addressed, including issues of computational overhead, model interpretability, and resistance from stakeholders. Strategies to overcome these challenges, such as hybrid approaches combining human expertise and AI automation, are proposed to ensure the feasibility of deployment in real-world scenarios. The study also underscores the importance of ethical considerations, emphasizing transparency and accountability in AI-driven decision-making processes to avoid unintended consequences in software systems.
Readership Data
Refreshing Cached Analytics Data
The cached analytics data has become stale and thesciencebrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.
Downloads
References
Lenarduzzi, V., Lomio, F., Saarimäki, N., & Taibi, D. (2020). Does migrating a monolithic system to microservices decrease the technical debt?. Journal of Systems and Software, 169, 110710.
Agarwal, A., Bird, S., Cozowicz, M., Hoang, L., Langford, J., Lee, S., ... & Slivkins, A. (2016). Making contextual decisions with low technical debt. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03966.
Alfayez, R., Alwehaibi, W., Winn, R., Venson, E., & Boehm, B. (2020, June). A systematic literature review of technical debt prioritization. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on technical debt (pp. 1-10).
Lenarduzzi, V., Martini, A., Taibi, D., & Tamburri, D. A. (2019, August). Towards surgically-precise technical debt estimation: Early results and research roadmap. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International workshop on machine learning techniques for software quality evaluation (pp. 37-42).
Ren, X., Xing, Z., Xia, X., Lo, D., Wang, X., & Grundy, J. (2019). Neural network-based detection of self-admitted technical debt: From performance to explainability. ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology (TOSEM), 28(3), 1-45.
Vipin Saini, Sai Ganesh Reddy, Dheeraj Kumar, and Tanzeem Ahmad, “Evaluating FHIR’s impact on Health Data Interoperability ”, IoT and Edge Comp. J, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–63, Mar. 2021.
Maksim Muravev, Artiom Kuciuk, V. Maksimov, Tanzeem Ahmad, and Ajay Aakula, “Blockchain’s Role in Enhancing Transparency and Security in Digital Transformation”, J. Sci. Tech., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 865–904, Oct. 2020.
Ampatzoglou, Areti, et al. "The financial aspect of managing technical debt: A systematic literature review." Information and Software Technology 64 (2015): 52-73.
Li, Zengyang, Paris Avgeriou, and Peng Liang. "A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management." Journal of Systems and Software 101 (2015): 193-220.
Brown, Nanette, et al. "Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems." Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research. 2010.
Seaman, Carolyn, and Yuepu Guo. "Measuring and monitoring technical debt." Advances in Computers. Vol. 82. Elsevier, 2011. 25-46.
Behutiye, Woubshet Nema, et al. "Analyzing the concept of technical debt in the context of agile software development: A systematic literature review." Information and Software Technology 82 (2017): 139-158.
Sculley, David, et al. "Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems." Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015).
Nugroho, Ariadi, Joost Visser, and Tobias Kuipers. "An empirical model of technical debt and interest." Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on managing technical debt. 2011.
Maldonado, Everton da S., and Emad Shihab. "Detecting and quantifying different types of self-admitted technical debt." 2015 IEEE 7Th international workshop on managing technical debt (MTD). IEEE, 2015.
Martini, Antonio, Terese Besker, and Jan Bosch. "Technical debt tracking: Current state of practice: A survey and multiple case study in 15 large organizations." Science of Computer Programming 163 (2018): 42-61.
da Silva Maldonado, Everton, Emad Shihab, and Nikolaos Tsantalis. "Using natural language processing to automatically detect self-admitted technical debt." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 43.11 (2017): 1044-1062.
Ren, Xiaoxue, et al. "Neural network-based detection of self-admitted technical debt: From performance to explainability." ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology (TOSEM) 28.3 (2019): 1-45.
Avgeriou, Paris, et al. "Managing technical debt in software engineering (dagstuhl seminar 16162)." (2016).
Tamburri, Damian A., et al. "Social debt in software engineering: insights from industry." Journal of Internet Services and Applications 6 (2015): 1-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of this research paper submitted to the journal owned and operated by The Science Brigade Group retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this Journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
