Cloud Platform Engineering for Enterprise AI and Machine Learning Workloads: Optimizing Resource Allocation and Performance

Authors

  • Srinivasan Ramalingam Highbrow Technology Inc, USA
  • Rama Krishna Inampudi Independent Researcher, Mexico
  • Manish Tomar Citibank, USA

Keywords:

cloud platform engineering, enterprise AI

Abstract

Cloud platform engineering has emerged as a critical area in enterprise computing, particularly for supporting the expanding needs of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) workloads. As these technologies gain prominence, the demand for computational resources, data processing capabilities, and efficient resource allocation intensifies, posing substantial challenges for enterprises that seek to leverage AI and ML at scale. This paper investigates the essential strategies and best practices for engineering cloud platforms tailored to the unique requirements of AI and ML workloads in enterprise environments, focusing on optimized resource allocation and enhanced performance. In doing so, we address key architectural components of cloud platforms, including infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and hybrid cloud models, exploring their advantages and limitations in handling dynamic, resource-intensive AI/ML tasks. Central to this analysis is the deployment of elastic resource management strategies, which enable enterprises to dynamically allocate computing power based on workload demands, thus preventing resource underutilization and reducing operational costs.

Our study delves into the integration of advanced orchestration and containerization frameworks, such as Kubernetes and Docker, which enable flexible deployment and scaling of ML models. By facilitating microservices-based architectures, these frameworks allow for greater modularity, version control, and ease of collaboration, all of which are vital in the iterative development of AI applications. Furthermore, we explore the role of serverless computing and function-as-a-service (FaaS) architectures in minimizing overhead for transient workloads, which is particularly advantageous for short-lived training jobs or inference tasks with intermittent demand. A comprehensive evaluation of these architectural choices is presented, considering their implications on latency, throughput, and fault tolerance.

Additionally, the paper investigates the importance of data management in cloud environments, given the large-scale data requirements intrinsic to AI and ML. We examine optimized data storage solutions, such as data lakes and distributed file systems, along with data caching and sharding techniques to improve data retrieval times and reduce latency. Moreover, we address data security and governance, focusing on compliance with enterprise data policies and regulations, especially for sensitive or proprietary datasets used in training and inference. The paper emphasizes the use of machine learning operations (MLOps) practices for streamlined model deployment and monitoring, highlighting the benefits of continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to maintain model accuracy and reliability across production environments.

In terms of performance optimization, the paper explores computational techniques and specialized hardware accelerators, including graphics processing units (GPUs), tensor processing units (TPUs), and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). These accelerators offer significant improvements in processing speed and efficiency for deep learning and other complex ML models. We also assess the impact of optimized networking protocols and low-latency interconnects on model training times, particularly in distributed training settings. Through case studies and empirical data, we provide insights into the trade-offs and considerations enterprises must navigate when selecting infrastructure configurations tailored to specific workload profiles and desired performance outcomes.

References

A. M. Turing, "Computing machinery and intelligence," Mind, vol. 59, no. 236, pp. 433-460, 1950.

J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, "MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters," in Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI ’04), San Francisco, CA, USA, Dec. 2004, pp. 137-150.

Tamanampudi, Venkata Mohit. "A Data-Driven Approach to Incident Management: Enhancing DevOps Operations with Machine Learning-Based Root Cause Analysis." Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research 6 (2020): 419-466.

Tamanampudi, Venkata Mohit. "Leveraging Machine Learning for Dynamic Resource Allocation in DevOps: A Scalable Approach to Managing Microservices Architectures." Journal of Science & Technology 1.1 (2020): 709-748.

S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S.-T. Leung, "The Google File System," in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP ’03), Bolton Landing, NY, USA, Oct. 2003, pp. 29-43.

M. Satyanand and D. Menasce, "AI and machine learning in cloud computing," Cloud Computing and Big Data, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 41-53, 2018.

A. D. Birrell and B. J. Nelson, "Implementing remote procedure calls," ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39-59, Feb. 1984.

F. C. Dobson and A. A. Vahdat, "The role of AI in modern cloud infrastructure," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 58-65, May/June 2018.

G. K. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, 1949.

A. B. Dinh, M. M. Hsieh, and Z. F. Zhang, "Container orchestration with Kubernetes for large-scale cloud applications," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 865-878, Jul.-Sept. 2019.

Y. Chen, S. Li, and L. Zhang, "Leveraging Kubernetes for scalable AI/ML workloads in cloud computing environments," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18-26, Jan.-Feb. 2019.

C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2006.

T. L. Shultz and L. C. Tsai, "Serverless computing for artificial intelligence in cloud environments," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1011-1023, Apr.-Jun. 2021.

A. Z. Vasilenko and S. Y. Lee, "Federated learning and privacy-preserving machine learning in cloud environments," IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 998-1010, Mar. 2021.

N. P. Sheth, "Introduction to AI and ML on cloud platforms," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 122-131, Jan.-Mar. 2020.

H. Xie, F. Liu, and Z. Zhang, "Energy-efficient AI in cloud systems," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 435-447, Oct.-Dec. 2021.

G. M. Constantine and J. C. Roberts, "The role of containerization and microservices in cloud AI deployments," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 215-228, Apr.-Jun. 2020.

S. K. Tiwari, R. Gupta, and P. Agarwal, "Optimizing machine learning model performance in cloud environments," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 898-909, Oct.-Dec. 2021.

L. H. Zhang, Y. Liu, and H. Xu, "Leveraging Kubernetes for real-time AI workloads in the cloud," Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp. 45-52, Dec. 2020.

C. J. Albrecht, "Scalable cloud AI: Beyond traditional infrastructure," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 278-285, Apr.-Jun. 2020.

D. R. Lovelace and B. R. P. Nair, "Edge computing: Enhancing cloud AI/ML models," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 76-84, May 2021.

K. S. Shaw, "Building a secure, compliant AI/ML infrastructure in the cloud," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 65-75, Nov.-Dec. 2022.

Downloads

Published

07-11-2022

How to Cite

[1]
Srinivasan Ramalingam, Rama Krishna Inampudi, and Manish Tomar, “Cloud Platform Engineering for Enterprise AI and Machine Learning Workloads: Optimizing Resource Allocation and Performance”, J. of Art. Int. Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 405–451, Nov. 2022.