Leveraging AI for Mortality Risk Prediction in Life Insurance: Techniques, Models, and Real-World Applications
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Machine LearningAbstract
The life insurance industry relies heavily on accurate mortality risk prediction to ensure financial stability and offer competitive products. Traditional underwriting methods, primarily dependent on self-reported data and medical history, often lack the granularity to capture the complex interplay of factors influencing longevity. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) techniques, has emerged as a powerful tool to address this challenge. This paper delves into the application of AI for mortality risk prediction in life insurance, exploring various techniques, model development processes, validation strategies, and real-world implementations for improved underwriting decisions.
The paper commences with an overview of the life insurance underwriting process, highlighting the significance of accurate mortality risk assessment. We then discuss the limitations of traditional methods, emphasizing the inability to capture emerging risk factors and potential biases in human judgment. Subsequently, the paper delves into the theoretical underpinnings of AI and ML, particularly supervised learning algorithms commonly employed for mortality risk prediction. Techniques such as logistic regression, random forests, and gradient boosting are explored, along with their strengths and weaknesses in this specific context.
A crucial aspect of this paper is the detailed exploration of model development and validation processes. We discuss data acquisition strategies, emphasizing the importance of data quality, diversity, and ethical considerations. Feature engineering techniques for transforming raw data into meaningful predictors for AI models are elaborated upon. The paper sheds light on model training methodologies, including cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning, to optimize model performance and prevent overfitting.
Validation of AI models for life insurance applications is paramount. We discuss various validation metrics relevant to mortality risk prediction, such as Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Brier Score. Techniques for assessing model calibration and fairness are also explored, ensuring reliable and unbiased predictions. Addressing the potential for bias in AI models due to inherent biases in training data or algorithmic design is crucial. The paper examines mitigation strategies such as fairness-aware data pre-processing and model interpretability techniques like SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values.
Following a thorough discussion of model development and validation, the paper transitions to exploring real-world applications of AI for mortality risk prediction in life insurance. We examine how AI can streamline underwriting processes by automating tasks and facilitating faster decision-making. The potential for personalized premiums based on individual risk profiles is explored, enabling a more just and competitive insurance market. Additionally, the paper discusses the role of AI in risk-based product development, allowing insurers to cater to specific customer segments with tailored insurance solutions.
The concluding section of the paper emphasizes the transformative potential of AI for the life insurance industry. While acknowledging the ethical considerations and regulatory hurdles surrounding the use of AI in insurance, the paper underscores the potential benefits of improved risk assessment, streamlined processes, and ultimately, a more efficient and inclusive insurance market. We propose future research directions, highlighting the need for continuous model development, robust validation frameworks, and ongoing efforts to ensure fairness and explainability in AI-powered underwriting.
References
A. I. Koning and M. J. van Wissen, "Mortality risk assessment in a life insurance context using proportional hazards models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 271-280, 2009. [doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.08.002]
Y. Luo et al., "Predicting mortality risk using deep neural networks with long short-term memory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 81, pp. 104-111, 2018. [doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.02.003]
H. Ding et al., "Explainable machine learning for mortality risk prediction in life insurance," arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.02153, 2020.
I. Witten, E. Frank, and M. A. Hall, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2016.
D. Pyle, Data Science Handbook (2nd ed.), O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2015.
A. Géron, Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras & TensorFlow (Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems), O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2017.
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer Series in Statistics), Springer New York Inc., 2009.
G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to Statistical Learning (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated), 2013.
Y. Bengio, "Tuning hyperparameters of a learning algorithm," Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 815-828, 2000. [doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00031-X]
T. G. Dietterich, "Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised learning algorithms," Artificial intelligence, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 1-31, 1997. [doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00061-X]
P. Christopoulos et al., "Calibration and refinement of machine learning models for predicting mortality risk," Biostatistics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22-31, 2020. [doi: 10.1093/biostat/fst083]
N. Naeini, G. S. Ongmongkolkul, and J. D. Walker, "Obtaining well-calibrated risk estimates in machine learning models: The importance of calibration," PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 5, e0195159, 2018. [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195159]
S. Mehrabi et al., "A survey of bias in machine learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.11592, 2019.
A. Selbst, D. Boyd, S. Crawford, and M. Gebru, "Fairness in artificial intelligence algorithmic bias, algorithmic fairness, and limits of fairness in machine learning," AI Now Institute, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of this research paper submitted to the journal owned and operated by The Science Brigade Group retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this Journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.